Back to top.
Zoom cheesecakelama:

opidiod:

wellversedinetiquettte:

What the fuck is wrong with this website

absolutely nothing

Its flawless

cheesecakelama:

opidiod:

wellversedinetiquettte:

What the fuck is wrong with this website

absolutely nothing

Its flawless

10.02.14 220266
Zoom
10.02.14 11102
Stop pouring yourself into people who are not complete.
They cannot hold your affection.
You will only leak out their cracks and find yourself on the floor.
10.01.14 1078
Zoom mapsontheweb:

Average number of thunderstorm days each year in the United States

I live in Orlando,Fl … Imagine

mapsontheweb:

Average number of thunderstorm days each year in the United States

I live in Orlando,Fl … Imagine

10.01.14 208
Zoom thoughtsofablackgirl:

Lmao
10.01.14 11024
Zoom note-a-bear:

jonesydaking:

zephr0n:

xxvalleygirlxx:

Drag em

WHERE IS THE LIE!?!?

Somebody doesn’t know there facts: Less teenagers are having sex NOW than EVER. More people are having protected sex NOW than EVER. Shut the fuck up dude

^^^^^THANKANDGODBLESSlet’s not forget, also, that CARRYING CONDOMS IS CRIMINALIZED IN LOTS OF PLACESSpecifically, it’s criminalized as a means to target sex workers. AND, because of profiling and transmisogyny and transmisogynoir, being used as a means to create a dragnet targeting non-white women and/or low-income women (of course, in this context, both of those categories are defined prejudicially and without any real regard to the women being targeted)So…like…even if that shit WAS actually true, it’s contingent upon harming women. SPECIFICALLY. Cause lord knows cops ain’t walking around doing pocket checks on men, or men-appearing, persons at the same rate (if at all) they do to WOMEN.***Note: I’m not trying to collapse or erase the specific effect and hazards this has on women who ARE sex workers. Because that is the ugly fucking heart of anti-condom legislation. It’s ANTI-SEX WORKER. What I’m trying to point at is that the PRIVILEGE to identify a complete stranger as a sex worker is held by cops and other state actors. And that privilege to identify women based on an almost-always arbitrary set of factors additionally impacts women who are not sex workers. tl;dr: It affects women broadly, in addition to its SPECIFIC target group.

note-a-bear:

jonesydaking:

zephr0n:

xxvalleygirlxx:

Drag em

WHERE IS THE LIE!?!?

Somebody doesn’t know there facts: Less teenagers are having sex NOW than EVER. More people are having protected sex NOW than EVER. Shut the fuck up dude

^^^^^THANKANDGODBLESS
let’s not forget, also, that CARRYING CONDOMS IS CRIMINALIZED IN LOTS OF PLACES
Specifically, it’s criminalized as a means to target sex workers. AND, because of profiling and transmisogyny and transmisogynoir, being used as a means to create a dragnet targeting non-white women and/or low-income women (of course, in this context, both of those categories are defined prejudicially and without any real regard to the women being targeted)

So…like…even if that shit WAS actually true, it’s contingent upon harming women. SPECIFICALLY. Cause lord knows cops ain’t walking around doing pocket checks on men, or men-appearing, persons at the same rate (if at all) they do to WOMEN.

***Note: I’m not trying to collapse or erase the specific effect and hazards this has on women who ARE sex workers. Because that is the ugly fucking heart of anti-condom legislation. It’s ANTI-SEX WORKER. What I’m trying to point at is that the PRIVILEGE to identify a complete stranger as a sex worker is held by cops and other state actors. And that privilege to identify women based on an almost-always arbitrary set of factors additionally impacts women who are not sex workers.
tl;dr: It affects women broadly, in addition to its SPECIFIC target group.

10.01.14 6377
Zoom dickprintbandit:

ghdos:

BRUHHHHHHH.

Jesus Christ.

dickprintbandit:

ghdos:

BRUHHHHHHH.

Jesus Christ.

10.01.14 99962
Zoom
10.01.14 722
Zoom christalsings:

houseofdawn:

WDYL.D.4.

Daddyyyyyyyyy

christalsings:

houseofdawn:

WDYL.D.4.

Daddyyyyyyyyy

10.01.14 2820
Zoom bron-tyde:

Oh my god who dosen’t want this on their blog?

bron-tyde:

Oh my god who dosen’t want this on their blog?

10.01.14 1505099